Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 vs HW-399

Verdict in brief

A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 and A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 are two non-condensing boilers from the A. O. Smith Conservationist Burkay (hot-water boilers) line. The A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 is rated 300,000 BTU/h natural and propane input, and the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 is rated 399,000 BTU/h natural and propane input. A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 99,000 more input than A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 (399,000 against 300,000). A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 51 lb more shipping weight than A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 (301 lb against 250 lb).

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 and A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399
SpecificationA. O. Smith Burkay HW-300A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399
Input rating300,000 BTU/h natural and propane399,000 BTU/h natural and propane
Approximate shipping weight250 lb301 lb
Water inlet / outlet1-1/4" NPT inlet / 1-1/4" NPT outlet1-1/2" NPT inlet / 1-1/2" NPT outlet
Gas inlet3/4" NPT3/4" NPT
FuelNatural gas or propane (LP)Natural gas or propane (LP)
Draft diverter outlet diameter8 in10 in
Recovery capacity (as printed)1,455 GPH at 20 °F rise (natural gas)1,935 GPH at 20 °F rise (natural gas)
Working pressure160 psi, ASME tested and certified160 psi, ASME tested and certified

What actually separates them

Published ratings: the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 is rated 300,000 BTU/h natural and propane input; the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 is rated 399,000 BTU/h natural and propane input. A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 99,000 more input than A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 (399,000 against 300,000).

A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 51 lb more shipping weight than A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 (301 lb against 250 lb). The water connections differs: the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 lists 1-1/4" NPT inlet / 1-1/4" NPT outlet, while the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 1-1/2" NPT inlet / 1-1/2" NPT outlet. The draft diverter outlet diameter differs: the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 lists 8 in, while the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 10 in. The recovery capacity differs: the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 lists 1,455 GPH at 20 °F rise (natural gas), while the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 1,935 GPH at 20 °F rise (natural gas).

Both records print the same gas connection (3/4" NPT), fuel (Natural gas or propane (LP)) and working pressure (160 psi, ASME tested and certified), per the cited sources.

CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
Output (max)
Not present in the AOSDG25600 PDF text layer
AFUE

The A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300 is a commercial gas-fired copper hot water boiler rated 300,000 BTU/h input, with 1-1/4" NPT water connections and a 3/4" NPT gas connection.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only
CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
Output (max)
319,200 BTU/h
AFUE

The A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 is a commercial gas-fired copper hot water boiler rated 399,000 BTU/h input and 319,200 BTU/h output, with 1-1/2" NPT water connections and a 3/4" NPT gas connection.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only

Frequently asked questions

Which of the two has the higher maximum input?

The A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399 lists 399,000 BTU/h natural and propane, against 300,000 BTU/h natural and propane on the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300, per the cited documentation.

How much heavier is the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-399?

It ships at 301 lb against 250 lb for the A. O. Smith Burkay HW-300, per the cited sources.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate