Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

Bryan BFIT 1500 vs BFIT 2000

Verdict in brief

Bryan BFIT 1500 and Bryan BFIT 2000 are two condensing boilers from the Bryan Boilers BFIT line. The Bryan BFIT 1500 is documented at 150,000–1,500,000 BTU/HR input, 1,440,000 BTU/HR output and 96% thermal efficiency, while the Bryan BFIT 2000 is documented at 399,000–1,999,000 BTU/HR input, 1,939,000 BTU/HR output and 97% thermal efficiency. Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 499,000 BTU/HR more input than Bryan BFIT 1500 (1,999,000 BTU/HR against 1,500,000 BTU/HR). Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 1 percentage points more thermal efficiency than Bryan BFIT 1500 (97% against 96%).

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of Bryan BFIT 1500 and Bryan BFIT 2000
SpecificationBryan BFIT 1500Bryan BFIT 2000
Input, low fire150,000 BTU/HR399,000 BTU/HR
Input, high fire1,500,000 BTU/HR1,999,000 BTU/HR
Output, high fire1,440,000 BTU/HR1,939,000 BTU/HR
Thermal / combustion efficiency96 %97 %
Burner turndown10:15:1
Water volume11 gal17 gal
Height40 1/4"42-3/4"
Width26 3/8"34-1/4"
Water connections (out / in)2" FNPT / 2" MNPT3" FNPT / 2-1/2" MNPT
Gas inlet connection1-1/4"1 1/4"
ASME Section IV rating160 PSIG / 210°F160 PSIG / 210°F
Electrical (appliance only)120 VAC, 1 phase, 60 Hz, 10 A max draw120 VAC, 1 phase, 60 Hz, 8.2 A max draw
FuelNatural Gas ONLYNatural Gas or LP
Boiler horsepower43 BHP58 BHP
Recovery rate (100°F rise)1,764 GPH97 (as printed) GPH
Heating surface1,440 (as printed) Sq.Ft.153 Sq.Ft.
Low NOx emissions<20 ppm<10 ppm
Approx. shipping weight770 lb1,217 lb
Length55 3/8"66-1/8"
Vent and air intake8"8"

What actually separates them

Published ratings: the Bryan BFIT 1500 is rated 150,000–1,500,000 BTU/HR input, 1,440,000 BTU/HR output and 96% thermal efficiency; the Bryan BFIT 2000 is rated 399,000–1,999,000 BTU/HR input, 1,939,000 BTU/HR output and 97% thermal efficiency. Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 499,000 BTU/HR more input than Bryan BFIT 1500 (1,999,000 BTU/HR against 1,500,000 BTU/HR). Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 1 percentage points more thermal efficiency than Bryan BFIT 1500 (97% against 96%).

The turndown differs: the Bryan BFIT 1500 lists 10:1, while the Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 5:1. The boiler water content differs: the Bryan BFIT 1500 lists 11 gal, while the Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 17 gal. The height differs: the Bryan BFIT 1500 lists 40 1/4", while the Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 42-3/4".

Both records print the same maximum operating pressure (160 PSIG / 210°F) and vent and air intake (8"), per the cited sources.

Bryan Boilers

Bryan BFIT 1500

CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
150000–1500000 BTU/HR
Output (max)
1,440,000 BTU/HR
AFUE

The Bryan BFIT 1500 is a commercial condensing stainless-steel boiler rated 1,500,000 BTU/hr input and 1,440,000 BTU/hr output at 96% thermal/combustion efficiency, 43 BHP, with 10:1 turndown and <20 ppm NOx in Bryan's published submittal.

Natural gasHeating-only

Bryan Boilers

Bryan BFIT 2000

CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
399000–1999000 BTU/HR
Output (max)
1,939,000 BTU/HR
AFUE

The Bryan BFIT 2000 is a commercial condensing stainless-steel boiler rated 1,999,000 BTU/hr input and 1,939,000 BTU/hr output at 97% thermal/combustion efficiency, 58 BHP, with 5:1 turndown and <10 ppm NOx in Bryan's published submittal.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only

Frequently asked questions

Which of the two has the higher maximum input?

The Bryan BFIT 2000 lists 1,999,000 BTU/HR, against 1,500,000 BTU/HR on the Bryan BFIT 1500, per the cited documentation.

Which model is more efficient?

The Bryan BFIT 2000 carries the higher published thermal efficiency at 97%, against 96%.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate