Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 vs Pro 65

Verdict in brief

De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 and De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 are two condensing boilers from the De Dietrich MCA Pro Series line. Published ratings: De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 at 34–156 MBH input, 146 MBH output and 94% efficiency; De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 at 34–235 MBH input, 222 MBH output and 94% efficiency. De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 lists 79 MBH more input than De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 (235 MBH against 156 MBH). Both list the same published efficiency of 94%. The published shipping weight differs: De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 lists 117 lb dry / 130 lb wetted, while De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 lists 133 lb dry / 147 lb wetted.

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 and De Dietrich MCA Pro 65
SpecificationDe Dietrich MCA Pro 45De Dietrich MCA Pro 65
Minimum input (as printed)34 MBH34 MBH
Maximum input (as printed)156 MBH235 MBH
Minimum heat output33 MBH45 MBH
Maximum heat output146 MBH222 MBH
FiringModulating, on/off, remote 0–10 VModulating, on/off, remote 0–10 V
Weight (dry / wetted)117 lb dry / 130 lb wetted133 lb dry / 147 lb wetted
Heating supply / return1-1/4" male NPT1-1/4" male NPT
Gas connection3/4" male NPT3/4" male NPT
FuelNatural gas or propane (LPG)Natural gas or propane (LPG)
Thermal efficiency (CSA certified)94 %94 %
Vent / combustion air3" single pipe / 80–125 mm concentric4" single pipe / 100–150 mm concentric
Operating water temperature range68–190 °F (CPVC / PP / SS)68–190 °F (CPVC / PP / SS)
CSA certified installation altitudeMax 4,500 ft / 1,370 m (Canada)Max 4,500 ft / 1,370 m (Canada)

What actually separates them

Published ratings: the De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 is rated 34–156 MBH input, 146 MBH output and 94% efficiency; the De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 is rated 34–235 MBH input, 222 MBH output and 94% efficiency. De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 lists 79 MBH more input than De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 (235 MBH against 156 MBH). Both list the same published efficiency of 94%.

The vent / combustion air differs: the De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 lists 3" single pipe / 80–125 mm concentric, while the De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 lists 4" single pipe / 100–150 mm concentric.

Both records print the same input (34 MBH), turndown (Modulating, on/off, remote 0–10 V), water connections (1-1/4" male NPT) and gas connection (3/4" male NPT), per the cited sources.

CurrentSold in Canada
Input
34–156 MBH
Output (max)
146 MBH
AFUE

The De Dietrich MCA Pro 45 is a condensing wall-hung boiler rated 34–156 MBH input and 33–146 MBH output at 94.0% CSA thermal efficiency, with 1-1/4" heating connections and a 117 lb dry weight.

Natural gasPropaneDHW: unknown
CurrentSold in Canada
Input
34–235 MBH
Output (max)
222 MBH
AFUE

The De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 is a condensing wall-hung boiler rated 34–235 MBH input and 45–222 MBH output at 94.0% CSA thermal efficiency, with 1-1/4" heating connections and a 133 lb dry weight.

Natural gasPropaneDHW: unknown

Frequently asked questions

Which of the two has the higher maximum input?

The De Dietrich MCA Pro 65 lists 235 MBH, against 156 MBH on the De Dietrich MCA Pro 45, per the cited documentation.

Which model is more efficient?

Both list the same efficiency of 94%.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate