Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

System 2000 EK2 Frontier 175,000 vs 250,000 BTU/hr

Verdict in brief

The EK2 Frontier 175,000 and 250,000 rows share the EK2 energy converter — 4 gallons of water and a 350 lb converter — so the decision is output against efficiency. The 175,000 row prints 149,000 BTU/hr at 85% AFUE natural gas; the 250,000 row reaches 204,000 BTU/hr at 82%, and both print 87% and 84% on propane respectively.

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of System 2000 EK2 Frontier 175,000 BTU/hr and System 2000 EK2 Frontier 250,000 BTU/hr
SpecificationSystem 2000 EK2 Frontier 175,000 BTU/hrSystem 2000 EK2 Frontier 250,000 BTU/hr
Input175,000 BTU/hr250,000 BTU/hr
Gross output (natural gas)149,000 BTU/hr204,000 BTU/hr
Efficiency (AFUE, natural gas)85 %82 %
Efficiency (AFUE, propane)87 %84 %
Water content4 gal4 gal
Energy converter weight350 lb350 lb
Domestic hot waterIntegrated system: heat plus domestic hot water from a storage tank using the Energy Manager controlIntegrated system: heat plus domestic hot water from a storage tank using the Energy Manager control

What actually separates them

Both rows use the EK2 energy converter with 4 gallons of water content, a 350 lb converter weight (plus 110 lb of jacket and insulation) and the same 10-foot counter-flow flue passage. The printed difference is capacity: 175,000 BTU/hr input with 149,000 BTU/hr gross output at 85% AFUE natural gas, versus 250,000 input with 204,000 output at 82%.

The propane columns run higher on both rows — 153,000 BTU/hr at 87% on the 175,000 row and 209,000 BTU/hr at 84% on the 250,000 row — which is the data sheet's pattern across the line. A 37% output increase costs three points of AFUE on natural gas.

System 2000 pairs either converter with the Energy Manager control and a storage tank for domestic hot water, so the sizing decision belongs to a heat-loss calculation plus the hot-water load, not to the boiler's maximum rating. In a home that never approaches 149,000 BTU/hr of load, the larger row simply gives up efficiency for capacity it cannot use.

CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
Output (max)
AFUE
85 %

The System 2000 EK2 Frontier 175,000 BTU/hr input row is the smallest EK2 size: 149,000 BTU/hr gross output at 85% AFUE on natural gas (153,000 BTU/hr at 87% on propane) through the EK2 energy converter.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only
CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
Output (max)
AFUE
82 %

The System 2000 EK2 Frontier 250,000 BTU/hr input row is the largest EK2 size: 204,000 BTU/hr gross output at 82% AFUE on natural gas (209,000 BTU/hr at 84% on propane) through the EK2 energy converter.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only

Frequently asked questions

Which EK2 row is more efficient?

The 175,000 BTU/hr row at 85% AFUE natural gas / 87% propane, against 82% / 84% on the 250,000 row per the EK1/EK2 gas data sheet.

Do both EK2 rows hold the same water volume?

Yes — the EK2 converter holds 4 gallons and weighs 350 lb; jacket and insulation add 110 lb per the data sheet feature table.

When does the 250,000 row make sense?

When the calculated heat loss plus the hot-water load genuinely exceeds what the 175,000 row delivers. Otherwise the smaller row's higher AFUE is the better match.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate