Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

HTP PHR-130-55C vs HTP PHR-199-55C

Verdict in brief

The HTP PHR-130-55C and HTP PHR-199-55C are both combination (combi) boilers in the HTP Versa-Flame (discontinued) line. The HTP PHR-130-55C is documented at 35–130 MBH input and 95% thermal efficiency, while the HTP PHR-199-55C is documented at 40–199 MBH input and 95% thermal efficiency. HTP PHR-199-55C lists 69 MBH more input than HTP PHR-130-55C (199 MBH against 130 MBH). Both list the same published thermal efficiency of 95%. Both list the same published shipping weight of 310 lb.

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of HTP PHR-130-55C and HTP PHR-199-55C
SpecificationHTP PHR-130-55CHTP PHR-199-55C
Input range, minimum35 MBH40 MBH
Input range, maximum130 MBH199 MBH
Thermal efficiency (as printed)95 %95 %
Turndown5:15:1
Shipping weight310 lb310 lb
Dimensions64.5" H x 23" diameter64.5" H x 23" diameter
Vent size2"3"
Tank size55 gal55 gal
Domestic hot water flow at 77 °F rise3.2 gpm4.8 gpm
First hour rating at 77 °F rise210 GPH300 GPH
ConnectionsSupply/return 1.25" NPT; gas 3/4" NPT; air vent 1/8"Supply/return 1.25" NPT; gas 3/4" NPT; air vent 1/8"
Heat exchanger and tankCopper nickel primary with 800H and copper nickel secondary; 304L stainless steel buffer tankCopper nickel primary with 800H and copper nickel secondary; 304L stainless steel buffer tank
Warranty12-year limited warranty12-year limited warranty

What actually separates them

Published ratings: the HTP PHR-130-55C is rated 35–130 MBH input and 95% thermal efficiency; the HTP PHR-199-55C is rated 40–199 MBH input and 95% thermal efficiency. HTP PHR-199-55C lists 69 MBH more input than HTP PHR-130-55C (199 MBH against 130 MBH). Both list the same published thermal efficiency of 95%.

The venting differs: the HTP PHR-130-55C lists 2", while the HTP PHR-199-55C lists 3". The domestic hot water flow at 77 °F rise differs: the HTP PHR-130-55C lists 3.2 gpm, while the HTP PHR-199-55C lists 4.8 gpm. The first hour rating at 77 °F rise differs: the HTP PHR-130-55C lists 210 GPH, while the HTP PHR-199-55C lists 300 GPH.

Both records print the same thermal efficiency (95%), turndown (5:1), shipping weight (310 lb) and dimensions (64.5" H x 23" diameter), per the cited sources.

DiscontinuedCanadian status unknown
Input
35–130 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE

The HTP PHR-130-55C is the 130 MBH class model of the retired Versa-Flame combined appliance line: 35,000 to 130,000 BTU/hr input, 55-gallon 304L stainless steel buffer tank, 3.2 GPM at a 77 °F rise and a 310 lb package, recorded from the official HTP-Versa-Flame brochure table.

Natural gasPropaneCombi
DiscontinuedCanadian status unknown
Input
40–199 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE

The HTP PHR-199-55C is the 199 MBH class model of the retired Versa-Flame combined appliance line: 40,000 to 199,000 BTU/hr input, 55-gallon 304L stainless steel buffer tank, 4.8 GPM at a 77 °F rise and a 310 lb package, recorded from the official HTP-Versa-Flame brochure table.

Natural gasPropaneCombi

Frequently asked questions

Which of the two has the higher maximum input?

The HTP PHR-199-55C lists 199 MBH, against 130 MBH on the HTP PHR-130-55C, per the cited documentation.

Which model is more efficient?

Both list the same thermal efficiency of 95%.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate