Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W vs CB470W

Verdict in brief

Both the Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W and the Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W belong to the Ideal Heating Commodore Wall line of condensing boilers. Published ratings: Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W at 72–399 MBH input, 381 MBH output and 95.5% efficiency; Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W at 83–470 MBH input, 453 MBH output and 95.6% efficiency. Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 71 MBH more input than Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W (470 MBH against 399 MBH). Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W carries the higher published efficiency at 95.6%, against 95.5%. Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 5 lb more shipping weight than Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W (198 lb against 193 lb).

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W and Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W
SpecificationIdeal Commodore Wall CB399WIdeal Commodore Wall CB470W
Input, minimum72 MBH83 MBH
Input, maximum399 MBH470 MBH
Turndown ratio5.5:15.7:1
Domestic hot waterHeating-only commercial boiler; DHW via a separate water heater or tankHeating-only commercial boiler; DHW via a separate water heater or tank
Weight193 lb198 lb
Height33.33 in33.33 in
Width17.5 in17.5 in
Depth21.2 in21.2 in
Vent length121 ft200 ft
Supply / return water connections (MNPT)1-1/2 in1-1/2 in
Gas connection (NPT)1 in1 in
Output381 MBH453 MBH
Net AHRI rating329 MBH394 MBH
Thermal efficiency95.5 %95.6 %
Rated volume2.5 gal2.7 gal
Flue connection, vent / air4 in6 in

What actually separates them

Published ratings: the Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W is rated 72–399 MBH input, 381 MBH output and 95.5% efficiency; the Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W is rated 83–470 MBH input, 453 MBH output and 95.6% efficiency. Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 71 MBH more input than Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W (470 MBH against 399 MBH). Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W carries the higher published efficiency at 95.6%, against 95.5%.

Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 5 lb more shipping weight than Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W (198 lb against 193 lb). The turndown differs: the Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W lists 5.5:1, while the Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 5.7:1. The vent length differs: the Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W lists 121 ft, while the Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 200 ft. The rated volume differs: the Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W lists 2.5 gal, while the Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 2.7 gal.

Both records print the same domestic-hot-water arrangement (Heating-only commercial boiler; DHW via a separate water heater or tank), height (33.33 in), width (17.5 in) and depth (21.2 in), per the cited sources.

CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
72–399 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE

The Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W is a commercial wall-hung condensing boiler: 72 to 399 MBH input, 95.5% printed thermal efficiency, 5.5:1 turndown and a 329 MBH net AHRI rating with 4-inch venting.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only
CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
83–470 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE

The Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W is a commercial wall-hung condensing boiler: 83 to 470 MBH input with the line's highest printed thermal efficiency at 95.6%, a 394 MBH net AHRI rating and 6-inch venting.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only

Frequently asked questions

Which of the two has the higher maximum input?

The Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W lists 470 MBH, against 399 MBH on the Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W, per the cited documentation.

Which model is more efficient?

The Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W carries the higher published efficiency at 95.6%, against 95.5%.

How much heavier is the Ideal Commodore Wall CB470W?

It ships at 198 lb against 193 lb for the Ideal Commodore Wall CB399W, per the cited sources.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate