Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

Utica MAC-115 vs Utica MAC-205

Verdict in brief

Utica MAC-115 and Utica MAC-205 are two combination (combi) boilers from the Utica Boilers MAC/MAH (AI condensing) line. Published ratings: Utica MAC-115 at 16.6–93.5 MBH input and 95% AFUE; Utica MAC-205 at 29.5–164 MBH input and 95% AFUE. Utica MAC-205 lists 70.5 MBH more input than Utica MAC-115 (164 MBH against 93.5 MBH). Both list the same published AFUE of 95%. Both list the same published shipping weight (94-125 lb).

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of Utica MAC-115 and Utica MAC-205
SpecificationUtica MAC-115Utica MAC-205
Central-heating input, minimum16.6 MBH29.5 MBH
Central-heating input, maximum93.5 MBH164 MBH
AFUE95 %95 %
Weight94-125 lb94-125 lb
Dimensions (H x W x D)30" x 17-3/4", depth 13-9/16" or 21-1/2"30" x 17-3/4", depth 13-9/16" or 21-1/2"
VentingCoaxial polypropylene or 2-pipe polypropylene/CPVC/PVCCoaxial polypropylene or 2-pipe polypropylene/CPVC/PVC
DHW flow rate at 70 °F rise2.5 gpm5 gpm
Turndown, heating mode5.6:15.5:1
Turndown, DHW mode6.9:17:1
Heat exchanger316L stainless steel heat exchanger and burner plus stainless steel brazed-plate DHW heat exchanger316L stainless steel heat exchanger and burner plus stainless steel brazed-plate DHW heat exchanger
Gas typeNatural gas or LP — recognized automaticallyNatural gas or LP — recognized automatically

What actually separates them

Published ratings: the Utica MAC-115 is rated 16.6–93.5 MBH input and 95% AFUE; the Utica MAC-205 is rated 29.5–164 MBH input and 95% AFUE. Utica MAC-205 lists 70.5 MBH more input than Utica MAC-115 (164 MBH against 93.5 MBH). Both list the same published AFUE of 95%.

The dhw flow rate at 70 °F rise differs: the Utica MAC-115 lists 2.5 gpm, while the Utica MAC-205 lists 5 gpm. The turndown, heating mode differs: the Utica MAC-115 lists 5.6:1, while the Utica MAC-205 lists 5.5:1. The turndown, dhw mode differs: the Utica MAC-115 lists 6.9:1, while the Utica MAC-205 lists 7:1.

Both records print the same AFUE (95%), shipping weight (94-125 lb), dimensions (30" x 17-3/4", depth 13-9/16" or 21-1/2") and venting (Coaxial polypropylene or 2-pipe polypropylene/CPVC/PVC), per the cited sources.

Utica Boilers

Utica MAC-115

DiscontinuedCanadian status unknown
Input
16.6–93.5 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE
95 %

The Utica MAC-115 is the 115-class (smallest) combi combi of the MAC 'AI' condensing line: 95% AFUE, on-demand DHW at 2.5 GPM (70 °F rise), 5.6:1 heating turndown and the 316L stainless steel heat exchanger. The MAC page prints '(While supplies last)' with no current documents, so this model is discontinued (sell-through).

Natural gasPropaneCombi

Utica Boilers

Utica MAC-205

DiscontinuedCanadian status unknown
Input
29.5–164 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE
95 %

The Utica MAC-205 is the 205-class (largest) combi combi of the MAC 'AI' condensing line: 95% AFUE, on-demand DHW at 5 GPM (70 °F rise), 5.5:1 heating turndown and the 316L stainless steel heat exchanger. The MAC page prints '(While supplies last)' with no current documents, so this model is discontinued (sell-through).

Natural gasPropaneCombi

Frequently asked questions

Which of the two has the higher maximum input?

The Utica MAC-205 lists 164 MBH, against 93.5 MBH on the Utica MAC-115, per the cited documentation.

Which model is more efficient?

Both list the same AFUE of 95%.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate