Skip to content
Boilers.caby ROMA Heating & Cooling

Comparison

Ideal Exalt Floor 110 vs Floor 199

Verdict in brief

Both the Ideal Exalt Floor 110 and the Ideal Exalt Floor 199 belong to the Ideal Heating Exalt Floor (heat-only) line of condensing boilers. The Ideal Exalt Floor 110 is documented at 13.75–110 MBH input, 102 MBH DOE heating capacity and 95% AFUE, while the Ideal Exalt Floor 199 is documented at 24.875–199 MBH input, 184 MBH DOE heating capacity and 95% AFUE. Ideal Exalt Floor 199 lists 89 MBH more input than Ideal Exalt Floor 110 (199 MBH against 110 MBH). Both list the same published AFUE of 95%. Ideal Exalt Floor 199 lists 24 lb more shipping weight than Ideal Exalt Floor 110 (169 lb against 145 lb).

Side by side

Published manufacturer figures. Input and output are kept separate; blanks mean the manufacturer did not publish that value.

Comparison of Ideal Exalt Floor 110 and Ideal Exalt Floor 199
SpecificationIdeal Exalt Floor 110Ideal Exalt Floor 199
Input, minimum (NG & LP)13.75 MBH24.875 MBH
Input, maximum (NG & LP)110 MBH199 MBH
Efficiency (AFUE)95 %95 %
Turndown ratio8:18:1
Domestic hot waterHeating-only; pair with a separate DHW sourceHeating-only; pair with a separate DHW source
Weight145 lb169 lb
Height41 in41 in
Width22 in22 in
Depth22 in22 in
Maximum vent length, 3 in100 ft100 ft
Supply / return connections (MNPT)1 in1 in
Gas connection (MNPT)3/4 in3/4 in
DOE heating capacity102 MBH184 MBH
AHRI net rating89 MBH159 MBH
Vent / air connections3 in3 in
Water volume2 gal4 gal
Integrated cascadeUp to 6 boilersUp to 6 boilers
Maximum CH flow temperature185 °F185 °F

What actually separates them

Published ratings: the Ideal Exalt Floor 110 is rated 13.75–110 MBH input, 102 MBH DOE heating capacity and 95% AFUE; the Ideal Exalt Floor 199 is rated 24.875–199 MBH input, 184 MBH DOE heating capacity and 95% AFUE. Ideal Exalt Floor 199 lists 89 MBH more input than Ideal Exalt Floor 110 (199 MBH against 110 MBH). Both list the same published AFUE of 95%.

Ideal Exalt Floor 199 lists 24 lb more shipping weight than Ideal Exalt Floor 110 (169 lb against 145 lb). The water volume differs: the Ideal Exalt Floor 110 lists 2 gal, while the Ideal Exalt Floor 199 lists 4 gal.

Both records print the same AFUE (95%), turndown (8:1), domestic-hot-water arrangement (Heating-only; pair with a separate DHW source) and height (41 in), per the cited sources.

CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
13.75–110 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE
95 %

The Ideal Exalt Floor 110 is the smallest floor-standing Exalt model: 13,750 to 110,000 BTU/h at 95% AFUE with an included Caleffi 548 separator, a pre-installed circulator and cascade control for up to six boilers.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only
CurrentCanadian status unknown
Input
24.875–199 MBH
Output (max)
AFUE
95 %

The Ideal Exalt Floor 199 is the largest floor-standing Exalt model: 24,875 to 199,000 BTU/h at 95% AFUE, 8:1 turndown and a 169 lb chassis with separator, circulator and six-boiler cascade capability.

Natural gasPropaneHeating-only

Frequently asked questions

Which of the two has the higher maximum input?

The Ideal Exalt Floor 199 lists 199 MBH, against 110 MBH on the Ideal Exalt Floor 110, per the cited documentation.

Which model is more efficient?

Both list the same AFUE of 95%.

How much heavier is the Ideal Exalt Floor 199?

It ships at 169 lb against 145 lb for the Ideal Exalt Floor 110, per the cited sources.

Not sure which one fits your home?

A consultation includes a heat-loss review so the size is right the first time.

On-site service in Greater Vancouver, BC. ROMA lists “Open 7 days” on its site; call to confirm same-day availability.

Sources and verification

Facts checked September 9, 2026. Last updated September 9, 2026. Technical reviewer: not yet assigned.

CallEmailEstimate